Motorola Razr Ultra 50 Ultra vs Razr 60 Ultra : Is it worth the jump?
From my technological vantage point, I ask myself: what has really changed between the Motorola Razr 50 Ultra and its successor, the Razr 60 Ultra ? I don't want to limit myself to repeating specifications, but rather to thoroughly analyze how each innovation impacts the user experience, especially in a demanding market like Chile.
With over ten years of experience covering smartphones, consoles, and virtual reality, my approach is technical yet accessible, objective, and backed by comparisons, benchmarks, and concrete evidence—no hype.
Design and dimensions: aesthetics and robustness in deployment
At first glance, both models share a roughly 6.9-inch LTPO AMOLED foldable display with a 21:9 aspect ratio. However, the 60 Ultra expands slightly to 7.0 inches with slimmer bezels, promising wider visibility when using apps or viewing media.
The 60 Ultra introduces a more durable titanium hinge and IP48 certification against dust and water , up from IPX8 on the 50 Ultra. Five days. This improves durability in real-world environments, which is essential in countries like Chile where the terrain varies widely.
Also noteworthy is the use of material combinations such as Gorilla Glass ceramic glass and eco-leather or wood finishes in limited editions, which provide a palpable premium feel.
Counterpoint:
The 60 Ultra's ultra-slim design (7.2 mm unfolded and just 15.7 mm folded) may slightly compromise ergonomics for some users. Weight has also increased to 199 g , compared to 188–189 g for the previous model.
Screens: extreme refresh rate and brightness
The most noticeable jump is in the panel quality. The Razr 60 Ultra offers 165Hz and up to 4,500 nits of peak brightness , compared to the 50 Ultra's 120Hz and approximately 3,000 nits .
From my experience in gaming and VR, those 165Hz make a difference for fluid animations, smooth scrolling, and demanding games. Plus, with Dolby Vision HDR, multimedia content gains realism and more accurate color saturation.
On the external screen (cover display), both offer pOLED of about 4 inches , although the 60 Ultra incorporates a refresh rate of 90 Hz that facilitates rapid interaction without unfolding the phone.
Performance and software: Moto AI takes center stage
The Razr 50 Ultra is powered by a Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 chipset with Android 14 and up to 12GB of RAM. . Instead, the Razr 60 Ultra features the Snapdragon 8 Elite , up to 16GB of RAM , and high-performance UFS 4.0 storage.
This translates into smooth multitasking, loading speeds, and responsiveness of high-end apps and games comparable to the best flagships of 2025. . Additionally, the Razr 60 Ultra debuted with Moto AI , features like Catch Me Up or Pay Attention that adapt notifications and interactions based on the user's context .
Counterpoint:
Some reviews warn of overheating during long charging sessions or heavy use , which can limit its sustained performance. Additionally, certain AI features may overlap with Google's native tools, creating redundancy and potential confusion.
Cameras: Computational Photography and Video in Detail
The Razr 50 Ultra already surprised by including a 50 MP 2x telephoto lens, unusual for foldable phones . But the Razr 60 Ultra maintains the main 50 MP sensor and combines it with a 50 MP ultra-wide with autofocus, useful for macro and wide shots .
In video, the 60 Ultra adds 8K@30fps recording, Dolby Vision HDR and EIS with gyroscope , which boosts stabilization and quality in mobile videos. .
Benchmarks show the Razr 60 Ultra reduces noise in dark scenes and produces more vibrant colors with better detail in selfies; though some prefer the 50 Ultra's more natural tone in portraits. .
Battery and charging: realistic autonomy
The jump here is not dramatic, but it is real: the Razr 60 Ultra 's battery goes up to 4,700 mAh (compared to the 50 Ultra's ~4,000–4,200 mAh) and supports 68W fast charging , as well as 30W wireless and reverse charging .
In real-world testing, the 60 Ultra can achieve 18 hours of mixed use and recovers charge significantly faster. This is useful for those who travel or need reliable battery life throughout the day without searching for additional portable components.
Trends and competitive positioning
With the Razr 60 Ultra, Motorola aims to challenge the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 7 or even the Z Flip FE for leadership, standing out for its battery, cameras, and fast charging .
Responds to trends such as:
-
Integrated AI with Moto AI , aligned with the market's mobile AI approach.
-
Advanced computational photography , with Pantone Validated Color and cinematic modes .
-
Sustainability and premium materials (wood, eco-leather, ceramic glass).
-
Next-generation connectivity , with Wi-Fi 7, NFC, 5G and Android updates
Consideration for users in Chile
In Chile, foldable adoption still faces significant barriers: high import prices, limited technical support, and uneven connectivity across regions. The Razr 50 Ultra debuted at around €1,200, and the Razr 60 Ultra costs over €1,300 or USD 1,299 .
Despite this, its focus on photography, battery life, and premium materials may resonate with professionals, tech enthusiasts, or creatives looking for mobility and innovation. For the average consumer, opting for the 50 Ultra after a sale or discount could offer a better price-performance ratio.
Final thought: Is it worth taking the plunge?
From my perspective, the Razr 60 Ultra represents a solid but not revolutionary evolution over the 50 Ultra. It incorporates real improvements in the display, performance, cameras, charging, and durability.
For users who already own the 50 Ultra, upgrading is only justified if they value extreme performance (Snapdragon 8 Elite), Moto AI features, or a smoother viewing experience. For new buyers, the 60 Ultra is positioned as one of the most complete foldable phones of 2025, especially compared to direct rivals in terms of design and functionality.
However, Huawei's redundant AI features with Google, potential thermal issues, and premium price could make the Razr 50 Ultra still an attractive option if found at a lower cost .